Founder Sherpa integrates AI throughout the discovery process to help you write better hypotheses, parse transcripts, generate questions, and analyze evidence at scale.Documentation Index
Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://docs.founder-sherpa.com/llms.txt
Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.
Problem statement quality check
When creating or editing a project’s problem statement, two layers of quality feedback are available:Real-time heuristics
As you type, a quality indicator classifies your statement as weak, moderate, or strong. The heuristic checks for:- Statement length and specificity
- Vague phrases (“improve things”, “better experience”)
- Missing specifics (numbers, roles, time/money references)
- Whether you’re describing a problem vs. a solution
- Whether the statement is phrased as a question
AI quality check
Click Check with AI for deeper analysis. The AI returns:- A quality rating with reasoning
- Specific improvement suggestions
- An optional rewrite you can accept with one click
Hypothesis quality check
Similar to the problem statement checker, each hypothesis has an AI quality check button that evaluates:- Whether the hypothesis is specific and testable
- Clarity of the target persona and expected behavior
- Suggestions for strengthening the statement
AI-suggested interview questions
While building interview guides, click Suggest Questions to generate targeted interview questions. The AI considers:- The persona you’re researching
- The hypotheses you’ve selected to test
- Your project’s problem statement
- The question text
- A rationale explaining why it’s relevant
- A suggested category
Transcript parsing
When you import a transcript, AI processes the full text to extract:- Evidence items — Key insights, quotes, and observations organized by hypothesis
- Interviewee identification — Who was being interviewed, with fuzzy matching against existing interviewees
- Question detection — Questions asked during the interview, matched against your question catalog
Hypothesis validation
From the project’s Hypotheses tab, you can validate individual hypotheses against collected evidence:- Select one or more hypotheses using the inline checkboxes
- Click ✦ Validate with AI
- The AI analyzes all linked evidence and returns an inline result panel with:
- A validation verdict (supported, contradicted, or inconclusive)
- Key evidence patterns and themes
- Gaps in your research that need more interviews
Hypotheses need a minimum amount of linked evidence before validation is available. The checkbox is disabled for hypotheses that don’t have enough evidence yet.
Batch analysis
From the project’s Insights tab, run batch analysis across all collected evidence. The AI:- Summarizes patterns across interviews
- Identifies which hypotheses have strong support or contradiction
- Highlights gaps where more evidence is needed
- Generates an audit report of your discovery progress
All AI features use server-side processing. Your data is sent to the AI provider for analysis and is not stored by the AI service beyond the request.